![2013 macbook pro charger wattage 2013 macbook pro charger wattage](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/articles/01S7cumzawdaH8JQrOwTiUv-2.fit_lim.size_1050x.png)
Jackery currently makes a 100W version of this but the USB-C port is limited to 15W. Hey, keep that MacBook Pro and e-bike charged from the car! Solar?Īnother possible use: Solar panels are often sized below 240W and instead of inefficient AC microinverters that would eventually need to convert inefficiently back to DC, could simply carry DC power over USB-C.
#2013 MACBOOK PRO CHARGER WATTAGE TV#
At 240W, new possibilities emerge: direct powering a TV or efficient projector and some camping gear without an inverter would be easy. At 100W, USB-C can fully replace that plug a few times over, which usually is usually fused at around 8amps or ~100W. We’re already seeing USB-C replace the “12V lighter” adapter in cars. In fact, many homes already have USB-C ports built into outlets. It isn’t a stretch to imagine a world that moves to USB-C direct current outlets in the home and even a separate DC backplane throughout the house. Things like space heaters, hair dryers, and power tools require much more wattage. That includes all but the most powerful gaming computers, lights, printers, and many kitchen appliances. While e-bikes are exploding in popularity right now and are an obvious choice for bidirectional USB-C PD 3.1 batteries, about 95% of household devices fall under the 240W power requirement. I’m not talking about charging your e-bike’s battery, I’m saying it could be the only battery(!!) and drive the 250W motor directly. What that means is that the same USB-C R3.1 external battery that could power your MacBook Pro could also power an e-bike. In fact, the European standard e-bike is about 250W of output(although there are many ways of cheating this that are being exploited by e-bike manufacturers). That means a typical e-bike will require 72-144W of power to be charged. My mind immediately went to e-bike chargers, which are typically 36V-48V and 2-4A on the low end.ġ40 Watts is more powerful than most baseline ebike chargers
![2013 macbook pro charger wattage 2013 macbook pro charger wattage](https://macmyths.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/which-macbook-charger-need.png)
Apple, which is often tempted into messing with standards is apparently leading the (ahem) charge on USB-C PD R3.1. Other companies have hacked USB-C to get over the 100W limit of USB-C (actually going from 5A to 6.5A instead of a higher voltage). Meanwhile Apple’s Power Adapter Tech Specs leave more than a little to be desired: Regulators are calling it USB PD R3.1 spec. In fact, there isn’t even a cool name for it. The standard is so new that USB-C cables that are compliant aren’t even on the market yet, and it’s part of the reason you can only charge at that speed with Apple’s $49 USB-C to Magsafe adapter cable, not directly to the USB-C ports that charge below 100W. It’s one of the first such adapters and certainly the first laptop to use the standard. But what’s hugely more interesting is that it’s USB-C Power Delivery 3.1 compliant. But this could be the biggest step change in the electronics industry this year.Īpple chose the gallium nitride (GAN, via Verge) format to allow it to be in a smaller package, and that’s certainly something we can get behind. Along with all of the fanfare during yesterday’s MacBook Pro launch, one thing I wasn’t expecting was a 140W USB-C power adapter.